Test Mode Active - Messages will be sent to your email only, not to legislators

Tell Your Executive Councilor to Reject Judge Daniel Will's Nomination

We must oppose the nomination of Judge Daniel Will to the NH Supreme Court to protect constitutional rights in New Hampshire.

READ MORE ABOUT JUDGE WILL'S RECORD: https://www.nhcornerstone.org/conservatives-must-relentlessly-oppose-judge-daniel-wills-nomination-to-the-nh-supreme-court/

Judge Daniel Will's confirmation would tilt New Hampshire's highest court to the left of Massachusetts for years to come.

If confirmed, conservatives can expect to lose on every major constitutional issue—from parental rights to free speech and religious liberty—until at least 2031.

Why This Nomination Threatens Conservative Values

The Court's Balance Is at Stake

With the federal First Circuit now the most liberal appeals court in America, the New Hampshire Constitution is our only real protection for fundamental rights. Judge Will's confirmation would create a five-justice Supreme Court with three judges hostile to conservative constitutional claims—guaranteeing automatic losses on the issues that matter most.

He Misled the Executive Council

When questioned during his Superior Court confirmation about his emergency-powers arguments, Judge Will told councilors "I have never made that argument." His own signed court pleadings proved otherwise. Councilor Dave Wheeler said plainly: "I feel that he was being deceptive."

A Record of Deference to Government Power

As Solicitor General, Will persuaded judges that executives have "broad latitude to suspend civil liberties" during emergencies—a theory that legislators said gave the executive branch "absolute power" and left our rights "at the mercy of the current governor."

The Time for Silence Is Over

For years, Republican governors have appointed liberal judges while conservatives stayed quiet to avoid party division. This nomination forces a choice: accept years of constitutional losses, or stand firm on principle.

Contact your Executive Councilor now. Tell them to vote NO on Judge Daniel Will's confirmation.

Message Preview

This is the message that will be sent on your behalf

Subject

Please Vote NO on Judge Daniel Will's Supreme Court Nomination

Dear Councilor, I am writing to urge you to vote NO on Judge Daniel Will's nomination to the New Hampshire Supreme Court. If confirmed to the Supreme Court, Judge Will would be devastating to the essential issues of parental rights, free speech, religious liberty, and more. I respectfully urge you to reject Judge Daniel Will's nomination and protect the constitutional rights of all Granite Staters. Thank you for your consideration.

Recipient name and your name/city are filled in automatically.

Find Your Legislators

Enter your New Hampshire address to find your state representatives.

READ MORE ABOUT JUDGE WILL'S RECORD: https://www.nhcornerstone.org/conservatives-must-relentlessly-oppose-judge-daniel-wills-nomination-to-the-nh-supreme-court/

Judge Daniel Will's confirmation would tilt New Hampshire's highest court to the left of Massachusetts for years to come.

If confirmed, conservatives can expect to lose on every major constitutional issue—from parental rights to free speech and religious liberty—until at least 2031.

Why This Nomination Threatens Conservative Values

The Court's Balance Is at Stake

With the federal First Circuit now the most liberal appeals court in America, the New Hampshire Constitution is our only real protection for fundamental rights. Judge Will's confirmation would create a five-justice Supreme Court with three judges hostile to conservative constitutional claims—guaranteeing automatic losses on the issues that matter most.

He Misled the Executive Council

When questioned during his Superior Court confirmation about his emergency-powers arguments, Judge Will told councilors "I have never made that argument." His own signed court pleadings proved otherwise. Councilor Dave Wheeler said plainly: "I feel that he was being deceptive."

A Record of Deference to Government Power

As Solicitor General, Will persuaded judges that executives have "broad latitude to suspend civil liberties" during emergencies—a theory that legislators said gave the executive branch "absolute power" and left our rights "at the mercy of the current governor."

The Time for Silence Is Over

For years, Republican governors have appointed liberal judges while conservatives stayed quiet to avoid party division. This nomination forces a choice: accept years of constitutional losses, or stand firm on principle.

Contact your Executive Councilor now. Tell them to vote NO on Judge Daniel Will's confirmation.

Find Your Executive Councilor

Enter your New Hampshire address to find your Executive Councilor.

Loading committee members...

Loading Executive Councilors...

Loading legislators...

of selected · Click to edit

Change Address

READ MORE ABOUT JUDGE WILL'S RECORD: https://www.nhcornerstone.org/conservatives-must-relentlessly-oppose-judge-daniel-wills-nomination-to-the-nh-supreme-court/

Judge Daniel Will's confirmation would tilt New Hampshire's highest court to the left of Massachusetts for years to come.

If confirmed, conservatives can expect to lose on every major constitutional issue—from parental rights to free speech and religious liberty—until at least 2031.

Why This Nomination Threatens Conservative Values

The Court's Balance Is at Stake

With the federal First Circuit now the most liberal appeals court in America, the New Hampshire Constitution is our only real protection for fundamental rights. Judge Will's confirmation would create a five-justice Supreme Court with three judges hostile to conservative constitutional claims—guaranteeing automatic losses on the issues that matter most.

He Misled the Executive Council

When questioned during his Superior Court confirmation about his emergency-powers arguments, Judge Will told councilors "I have never made that argument." His own signed court pleadings proved otherwise. Councilor Dave Wheeler said plainly: "I feel that he was being deceptive."

A Record of Deference to Government Power

As Solicitor General, Will persuaded judges that executives have "broad latitude to suspend civil liberties" during emergencies—a theory that legislators said gave the executive branch "absolute power" and left our rights "at the mercy of the current governor."

The Time for Silence Is Over

For years, Republican governors have appointed liberal judges while conservatives stayed quiet to avoid party division. This nomination forces a choice: accept years of constitutional losses, or stand firm on principle.

Contact your Executive Councilor now. Tell them to vote NO on Judge Daniel Will's confirmation.

Send Your Message

"Dear [Recipient]" and your name/city are added automatically.

Message Sent!

Thank you for making your voice heard! Your message has been sent to your Executive Councilor. Please share this campaign with your friends and family to maximize our impact.